Mr. Reich, you have it wrong - on both counts.

"Hillary Clinton is best qualified to be president of the political system we now have"

WRONG - She wasn't even the best qualified candidate in 2008. Bernie Sanders is best qualified to be President in the political system we now have.

"Bernie is best qualified to get the system we need"

WRONG ON TWO COUNTS - 1) that 'system' will never happen so long as people hold their noses and vote for the candidate they dislike the least. And it won't happen as long as there are people like you Mr. Reich who go around pretending she's somehow qualified when she isn't. My biggest issue with Hillary Clinton is that I don't trust her because she has a trend for not learning from her mistakes. In order to get the candidate they do like, they have become part of the process and really stick with it to ensure they don't lose perspective and begin to compromise. That's exactly how people like Bernie Sanders came to be. Which leads to 2) that system will only come about via the political revolution Bernie speaks of.  People coming together to invoke change for the better - is that not what a political revolution is? The system we need doesn't exist - only that revolution will make it possible. So a single person to lead that future isn't here yet - they are still part of the revolution, but they'll only come to the forefront in the future, once the revolution is underway. For that to happen, voters need to make good decisions now,  not keep repeating the same mistakes of voting for the establishment candidate (yes Charles Koch, the owner of all things toilet paper support Hillary Clinton. That's enough to ensure I don't vote for her).