http://blogs.phillymag.com/the_philly_post/2012/10/19/lance-armstrong-conned-america/
Gotta love the comment -
"So what, exactly, was Armstrong supposed to do? Say "Yes, I took drugs, because that is the only way to compete as a professional athlete"? Or be the best cyclist of his age yet struggle to finish in the top 20 for a moral victory? He told the lie his sport and the public demanded--the same lie thousands of athlete tell, or would if asked."
Gotta love the attitude - win at all costs, even if it means cheating and lying. Cause that's actually winning to this guy.
Well gee, if he couldn't compete fairly, then that makes cheating ok? And so what if he played fair and didn't win?
It may have just been a 'moral victory', but at least it would've been an honest one.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Normally I don't post things from social media outlets.
Like many sites, LinkedIn has its share of cesspool and idiocy. That being said, this came up, and it does reflect a lot of what I have both...
No comments:
Post a Comment