Well look who a bunch of leaders who declared glyphosate safe got their info from?

Monsanto.

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2019/01/17/plagiarism-allegation-likely-to-spur-activist-challenges-of-eu-approval-of-monsantos-glyphosate-based-weed-killer-roundup/

Plagiarism was discovered exclusively in the chapters dealing with the assessment of published studies on health risks related to glyphosate. In these chapters, 50.1% of the content was identified as plagiarism….the study authors found clear evidence of BfR’s deliberate pretense of an independent assessment, whereas in reality the authority was only echoing the industry applicants’ assessment.

Oh, and in the US ...

https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2019/01/more-documentation-of-epas-failures-in-allowing-use-of-roundup-as-french-court-bans-it/ 

Dr. Benbrook’s analysis considered the number and nature of the glyphosate studies evaluated by IARC and EPA. His conclusion? “Clearly, compared to EPA’s genotoxicity review, the IARC review is grounded on more recent, more sensitive, and more sophisticated genotoxic studies, and more accurately reflects real-world exposures.” In addition, he noted that EPA has relied for its fundamental assessment of glyphosate on dozens of studies paid for by Monsanto (and other makers of glyphosate products) that found no evidence of association with the development of cancer in those exposed.