I've always wondered about this. Now I know -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flammability#Linguistics:_flammable_vs._inflammable
Flammable and inflammable both mean capable of burning. The word "inflammable" came from Latin inflammāre = "to set fire to," where the prefix "in-" means "in" as in "indoctrinate", rather than "not" as in "invisible" and "ineligible". Nonetheless, "inflammable" is often erroneously thought to mean "non-flammable". This safety hazard has been avoided by the use of flammable on warning labels referring to physical combustibility. In the United States the word inflammable has been largely abandoned in common, scientific, industrial, and written language.[1] Antonyms of flammable/inflammable are non-flammable, non-inflammable, incombustible, non-combustible, uninflammable, or simply "not flammable".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Speaking of US, a reminder of something from nearly 20 years ago.
https://nazmino.net/en/wesley-clarks-revelation/ One of Clark’s most controversial statements came in a 2007 interview, where he revealed a ...
-
And unhappiness. Let's start the latter first; to get it out of the way. I realize that a great deal of what makes me unhappy in my life...
-
https://realleecamp.substack.com/p/ai-execs-admit-to-the-largest-labor
No comments:
Post a Comment