I object to any kind of doctrine – regardless of whatever positive messages surround it – that ultimately compel the believer to take actions that place of the value of a person or people over another.
I object to any kind of doctrine that causes the believer to suspend acceptance of reality by shutting down the ability to observe, to think, to learn, and to act.
This is not the same as caring for one’s family. That is based on love (which are based on my beliefs, yes), but from a broader and more general standpoint, I’m legally accountable for their actions, and am bound by the law to value them over others by taking care of them, to a certain age.
I'd like to think this largely reconciles with my assertion of secular humanism, but am not completely sure.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Normally I don't post things from social media outlets.
Like many sites, LinkedIn has its share of cesspool and idiocy. That being said, this came up, and it does reflect a lot of what I have both...
-
https://blackagendareport.com/unhoused-why-its-always-about-land For those of us who aren't white or rich, having land means something. ...
-
https://blackagendareport.com/settler-colonialism-light-f-fanon-algeria-yesterday-kanaky-today-part-1 https://blackagendareport.com/settler-...
-
This time it'll be a little longer than normal. We'll see how well things go. After all, it does apparently keep me employed.
No comments:
Post a Comment