http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2013/12/gates-foundations-24-most-egregious-investments
I noticed this at Microsoft - he always talked a good game and it sounded good, but somehow it always got twisted and ended up evil.
2013-12-07
2013-12-05
New shoe blues
I must have weird feet. It seems over the last few years it's been extremely difficult to find a pair of shoes that not only fit comfortably, but don't fall apart.
Is it I have poor judgement? Bad taste? Or just bad luck?
Granted I think I put shoes through a lot more paces than say 10 years ago. But still ...
Finding a pair of black leather shoes that don't crack, are weather-resistant, and are afffordable ...
America, why do you mock me so?
2013-12-04
'messy public relations' indeed.
"I suspect this decision has a lot more to do with messy public
relations than with science. From a strictly scientific perspective, the
Séralini study isn’t a big deal: It’s just one of the many safety trials that researchers have performed on GM foods;
it amounts to little when considered as part of the whole picture. The
way scientists usually deal with this sort of finding is to ignore it.
As Séralini’s team pointed out in a response to the retraction [doc], many other studies might be disqualified if they were held to the same standard.
From a public-relations perspective, on the other hand, the Séralini study is a huge deal. To people who aren’t familiar with the larger body of research, and who mistrust GMOs, it looks like proof that GM food kills. It produced disturbing images of tumorous rats that continue bouncing around social media to this day. The retraction provides an easy rejoinder to that sort of thing. As in, “You know that study was retracted, right?”"
Stupidity and its need to circumvent fact and observation wins out here - only because it's institutionalized.
But facts are a pesky thing - they just don't go away because enough people have been convinced to ignore the reality of what observing those facts mean.
http://grist.org/food/rat-retraction-reaction-journal-pulls-its-gmos-cause-rat-tumors-study/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Daily%2520Nov%25203&utm_campaign=daily
From a public-relations perspective, on the other hand, the Séralini study is a huge deal. To people who aren’t familiar with the larger body of research, and who mistrust GMOs, it looks like proof that GM food kills. It produced disturbing images of tumorous rats that continue bouncing around social media to this day. The retraction provides an easy rejoinder to that sort of thing. As in, “You know that study was retracted, right?”"
Stupidity and its need to circumvent fact and observation wins out here - only because it's institutionalized.
But facts are a pesky thing - they just don't go away because enough people have been convinced to ignore the reality of what observing those facts mean.
http://grist.org/food/rat-retraction-reaction-journal-pulls-its-gmos-cause-rat-tumors-study/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Daily%2520Nov%25203&utm_campaign=daily
2013-12-03
This sounds like a good idea to me.
Environmentalists Want to Name Deadly Storms After Climate-Change Skeptics
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-12-03/environmentalists-want-to-name-deadly-storms-after-climate-change-skeptics2013-12-01
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
RIP Sass Jordan.
A Canadian rock lass with class. A great singer and songwriter who will be greatly missed. Her music will live on.
-
https://sportsnaut.com/preview-canadiens-eager-going-again-with-oilers-up/ " The contest will make up one of games postponed after Mon...
-
This time it'll be a little longer than normal. We'll see how well things go. After all, it does apparently keep me employed.