It said the following -
"Ralph Nader's vanity campaign in 2000 handed Florida and the White House to George W. Bush, and we got accelerated climate change and tragic, endless war in the Middle East. Jill Stein's third-party campaign, with a boost from the Kremlin, helped Trump and his band of kleptocrats grab the power to bring our nation to the brink of disaster -- and that's just what they've done. "
Oh really?
Here's part of my response -
"Seems to me in looking at the voting-eligible population data of the last few elections, I'm seeing the following -
2000 (http://www.electproject.org/2000g)
2004 (http://www.electproject.org/2004g)
2008 (http://www.electproject.org/2008g)
2012 (http://www.electproject.org/2012g)
2016 (http://www.electproject.org/2016g)
Given that the % of voter ballots turned in over the last 5 elections is consistently under 66% of the Voter Eligible Population (VEP), that tells me that neither the voting for Ralph Nader in 2000 nor Jill Stein in 2016 were decisive factors in deciding the election to either corporate brand. Your statements about these two Presidential candidates are clearly false.
If you and your staff were smart, rather than sending emails containing statements like the one above, you'd spend your time trying to figure out why a large bloc of the voter eligible population didn't vote at all. Had you done so, you wouldn't be wasting my time being forced to read stuff you appeared to have pulled out of your collective asses.
And if after reading this you are either unable or unwilling to do so, while you're free to continue pulling stuff out of your asses and sending it, don't do it in my Inbox."
"Ralph Nader's vanity campaign in 2000 handed Florida and the White House to George W. Bush, and we got accelerated climate change and tragic, endless war in the Middle East. Jill Stein's third-party campaign, with a boost from the Kremlin, helped Trump and his band of kleptocrats grab the power to bring our nation to the brink of disaster -- and that's just what they've done. "
Oh really?
Here's part of my response -
"Seems to me in looking at the voting-eligible population data of the last few elections, I'm seeing the following -
2000 (http://www.electproject.org/2000g)
Turnout Rates | Numerators | Denominators | VEP Components (Modifications to VAP to Calculate VEP) | |||||||||||
2
| VEP Total Ballots Counted | VEP Highest Office | VAP Highest Office | Total Ballots Counted | Highest Office | Voting-Eligible Population (VEP) | Voting-Age Population (VAP) | % Non-citizen | Prison | Probation | Parole | Total Ineligible Felon | Overseas Eligible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3
| United States | 55.3% | 54.2% | 50.0% | 107,390,107 | 105,375,486 | 194,331,436 | 210,623,408 | 7.7% | 1,377,013 | 2,339,388 | 536,039 | 3,082,746 | 2,937,000 |
2004 (http://www.electproject.org/2004g)
e | Turnout Rates | Numerators | Denominators | VEP Components (Modifications to VAP to Calculate VEP) | ||||||||||
2
| VEP Total Ballots Counted | VEP Highest Office | VAP Highest Office | Total Ballots Counted | Highest Office | Voting-Eligible Population (VEP) | Voting-Age Population (VAP) | % Non-citizen | Prison | Probation | Parole | Total Ineligible Felon | Overseas Eligible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3
| United States | 60.7% | 60.1% | 55.4% | 123,535,883 | 122,294,978 | 203,483,455 | 220,336,019 | 8.2% | 1,490,169 | 2,387,283 | 474,632 | 3,158,443 | 3,862,836 |
2008 (http://www.electproject.org/2008g)
Turnout Rates | Numerators | Denominators | VEP Components (Modifications to VAP to Calculate VEP) | |||||||||||
2
| VEP Total Ballots Counted | VEP Highest Office | VAP Highest Office | Total Ballots Counted | Highest Office | Voting-Eligible Population (VEP) | Voting-Age Population (VAP) | % Non-citizen | Prison | Probation | Parole | Total Ineligible Felon | Overseas Eligible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3
| United States | 62.2% | 61.6% | 56.9% | 132,609,063 | 131,304,731 | 213,313,508 | 230,872,030 | 8.4% | 1,605,448 | 2,451,085 | 627,680 | 3,144,831 | 4,972,217 |
2012 (http://www.electproject.org/2012g)
Turnout Rates | Numerators | Denominators | VEP Components (Modifications to VAP to Calculate VEP) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2
| VEP Total Ballots Counted | VEP Highest Office | VAP Highest Office | Total Ballots Counted | Highest Office | Voting-Eligible Population (VEP) | Voting-Age Population (VAP) | % Non-citizen | Prison | Probation | Parole | Total Ineligible Felon | Overseas Eligible |
State Abv
| |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3
| United States | 58.6% | 58.0% | 53.6% | 130,292,355 | 129,070,906 | 222,474,111 | 240,957,993 | 8.4% | 1,473,412 | 2,342,582 | 637,410 | 3,352,390 | 5,127,418 |
2016 (http://www.electproject.org/2016g)
te | Turnout Rates | Numerators | Denominators | VEP Components (Modifications to VAP to Calculate VEP) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2
| State Results Website | Status | VEP Total Ballots Counted | VEP Highest Office | VAP Highest Office | Total Ballots Counted (Estimate) | Highest Office | Voting-Eligible Population (VEP) | Voting-Age Population (VAP) | % Non-citizen | Prison | Probation | Parole | Total Ineligible Felon | Overseas Eligible |
State Abv
| |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3
| United States | 60.1% | 59.2% | 54.7% | 138,846,571 | 136,700,729 | 230,931,921 | 250,055,734 | 8.3% | 1,416,810 | 2,198,907 | 506,297 | 3,176,484 | 4,739,596 |
Given that the % of voter ballots turned in over the last 5 elections is consistently under 66% of the Voter Eligible Population (VEP), that tells me that neither the voting for Ralph Nader in 2000 nor Jill Stein in 2016 were decisive factors in deciding the election to either corporate brand. Your statements about these two Presidential candidates are clearly false.
If you and your staff were smart, rather than sending emails containing statements like the one above, you'd spend your time trying to figure out why a large bloc of the voter eligible population didn't vote at all. Had you done so, you wouldn't be wasting my time being forced to read stuff you appeared to have pulled out of your collective asses.
And if after reading this you are either unable or unwilling to do so, while you're free to continue pulling stuff out of your asses and sending it, don't do it in my Inbox."
No comments:
Post a Comment